Welcome to the North Mymms History Project

A growing collection of books, features, images, documents, and maps, collected, curated, and presented by a team of local volunteers keen to preserve the history of North Mymms

Foundling Hospital wet nurses of North Mymms

Scan of The Foundling Hospital, Holborn, London: a bird's-eye view of the courtyard. Coloured engraving by T. Bowles after L. P. Boitard, 1753. Image from Wikimedia Commons

The Foundling Hospital, Holborn, London: a bird's-eye view of the courtyard
Coloured engraving by T. Bowles after L. P. Boitard, 1753
Image from Wellcome Images via Wikimedia Commons

In the mid 1700s a register was kept of local nursing mothers who were prepared to feed and nourish unwanted babies from the Foundling Hospital in London. In North Mymms, South Mimms, London Colney, St Albans, and Hatfield, there were a total of 80 women named. Seven lived in North Mymms and six in South Mimms, with five in Colney Heath.

We have the document, which is from the Peter Miller Collection and which lists all the women by name, embedded later in this piece.

According to Wikipedia: "wet-nursing was a well-paid, respectable and popular job for many lower class women in England. In 17th- and 18th-century Britain, a woman would earn more money as a wet nurse than her husband could as a labourer"...
"Women took in babies for money in Victorian Britain, and nursed them themselves or fed them with whatever was cheapest. This was known as baby-farming; poor care sometimes resulted in high infant death rates. The wetnurse at this period was most likely a single woman who previously had given birth to an illegitimate child. 
"There were two types of wet nurses in Victorian England. There were those on poor relief, who struggled to provide sufficiently for themselves or their charges, and there were professional wet nurses who were well paid and respected."

According to the National Archives site, the Foundling Hospital was started by Thomas Coram, a philanthropist who was appalled to see children and babies dying on London’s streets.

"The word 'hospital' implied the hospitality shown to children in their care, rather than a place for the sick. Mothers brought their babies to the Hospital, where they would be given a new name. However, mothers left a token with the hospital, such as a scrap of fabric or a coin, so that the child could be identified if the mother enquired about or wanted to claim the child. 
"The first children were admitted in 1741. In 1745 their purpose built children's home was opened in Bloomsbury, London, which at that time was surrounded by fields. By the early 19th century, the hospital mainly wanted to help illegitimate children: 'the design of the founder… being twofold - to hide the shame of the mother, as well as to preserve the life of the child'. Children had to be under 12 months of age, and were admitted after the mother had been interviewed and deemed to fit the criteria set out by the hospital. Once they had been accepted, children were registered, and were sent to live with a 'nurse' or foster family in the country. When they reached four or five years of age, children were sent to live at the Foundling Hospital in London, where they received schooling until they were 15 years old, and then were apprenticed, usually to work in domestic or military service."

Local historian and archivist, Peter Miller, has shared a document with this site (embedded below) that lists the local wet nurses in the middle of the 18th century. Click on the image below for a larger version.

A page from the book ...   From the Peter Miller Collection
A page from the book ...   From the Peter Miller Collection
The document above tells the story of baby number 6010 who had been left at the Foundling Hospital illegally, and how his mother, Betty Harding of St Albans, fought to get him back.

"Her illegitimate son, named John Andrews, was delivered illegally into the Foundling Hospital on 18 October 1757 (the father appears to have been John Andrews). Betty Harding petitioned for the return of her son on 9 November 1757 . She named two sureties and deposited £5 5s 0d to cover the charges incurred by the hospital. The baby was returned from Epping. He had been numbered 6010 and baptised with a new name - Edward Vincent."

In her medical research essay written in 1988 and embedded below, Valerie Fildes looks into 'The English wet-nurse and her role in infant care 1538-1800'. She points out that of the 62 Hertfordshire parishes, 36 (58%) accepted nurse-children, principally from London, and between 1544 and 1800 they buried 1,912 nurse-children. Between 1614 and 1752, North Mimms buried 65.

A series of graphics in the embedded document below show how North Mimms was not listed as a parish offering wet-nursing between 1550 and 1599 (figure 2a), whereas between 1700 and 1749, North Mimms is marked as one of the Hertfordshire parishes "burying large numbers of nurse-children" (figure 2d).

According to Wikipedia, wet nursing in England decreased in popularity during the mid-19th century due to the writings of medical journalists concerning the undocumented health risks.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments on this piece
If you have any information to add to this item, please use the comment box below. We welcome input and are keen to update any piece with new research or information. Comments are pre-moderated, so there will be a delay before they go live. Thanks

Further information
If you require any further information relating to this, or any other item, please use the contact form, because we are unable to reply directly to you via this comment box. You can access it from the 'contact us' link at the top of any page on the website, at the bottom of the right hand side of the website, or at the bottom of any page.